Although school shootings are rare in Brazil, it has had a few.
2002, Salvador- A 17-year-old student shot two girls inside their classroom. Vanessa (15) was shot dead, while Natasha (15) was shot in the head, chest and in the lung, but died in the hospital. According to students, the shooter and the two girls had an argument and the girls used to make fun of him.
2003, São Paulo- Edimar (18) entered his former high school and had fired about fifteen times, injuring eight people. Then, he committed suicide. One of the victims is now paraplegic. According to Edimar’s friends, they used to make fun of Edimar because of his weight.
2011, Rio de Janeiro- Welligton Oliveira (23) entered at his former school by saying he had come to give a lecture. Once inside, he went into a classroom and started shooting. He opened fire in at least two classrooms.
Twelve students were killed and at least eighteen others were wounded. Welligton killed committed suicide by shooting himself inside the school.
The marjority of the students he killed were women.
Welligton made videos and left a letter explaining the reason of his crime. He stated that suffered bullying when he studied at that school, and he also gave details of what the bullies did to him.
You can see the images captured by the school security cameras
here.
2011, Piauí- Although this case was not a shooting, it was also a consequence of bullying.
A 14-year-old student stabbed another student to death. He said to police that his intention was not to kill, but to scare the bully. The student also stated that he used to be bullied physically and verbally almost every day at the school.
2011, São Caetano do Sul, São Paulo- The 10-year-old student David Mota took a gun to school and shot his teacher inside the classroom. Then, he left the classroom and shot himself in the head. Both teacher and David were taken to the hospital but David died.
2017, Goiânia- A 14-year-old student shot dead two students and left other four injured at his school. One of the survivors is now paraplegic. He used the gun of his mother who is a police officer, such as his father. The motivation for the crime was because he had been suffering from bullying, such as the other students calling him “smelly” because he did not use deodorant. You can read more hereandhere.
A friend asked me if I had any pointers on drawing dingle dongles and I may or may not have gotten totally carried away and drew out a bunch of stuff, heheh. Figured Id post it just in case any nsfw artists found it helpful at all~
Also if I have any incorrect info or you have tips feel free to let me know. Always eager to supplement my penis expertise~ haha~
thank you now everyone can stop drawing upside down dongs
If you call pedophilia a kink please unfollow me and never talk to me again
Isn’t it disgusting that 23 people just unfollowed me
Unfollow me too
this goes double if you call paedophilia a disability. unfollow me twice
and if you call pedophilia an “orientation” or in any way compare it to being LGBP+ you can unfollow, delete your blog, and set yourself on fire.
I just lost 50 followers.. bye
clearing out the trash
GO ON AND S M A S H THAT UNFOLLOW BUTTON
BUHBYE U McNASTIES
I’ve seen this circulating forever and genuinely thought “no way do I have any of them following me” until this week when it turned out I had all these fuckin “MAP” (pedophile) followers sad to find out I’m an “anti” (normal person)
Please leave and also please get guinea worm.
I really hope no one that follows me is like this but for real, if you are, please unfollow.
Ditto
In case you didn’t get the message, if you’re into kids unfollow me; if you’re not into kids, reblog this!!!
Buh bye, no thanks
Csa survivor with zero time, patience, or tolerance for pedos/MAPs/apologists/whateverthefuck you sick fucks are calling yourselves.
Unfollow me right the fuck now!!!!
Beep beep trash cleaning day.
I hope this doesn’t apply to any of my followers, but if it does: kindly get mental help and GTFO.
I hope that none of my Totoros are like this, but if so, just in case: pls get yourself mental help.
(When I was 7-8 y/o I was sexually harassed by a pedophile so I know what I’m talkin’ about. Knowing someone like that could be following me here creeps me out.)
yeet a pedo tried to kidnap/grab me from a grocery store once when i was 10 so ya unfollow me too
My Son, The Killer is a bit of a mess as it only asks more
questions than what it answers and makes the case of Magnotta more sensationalised
as if it needed any more. There are parts
of the book that deal with the crime and a mother’s justification of herself as
she deals with her son’s life choices.
On one hand, we have a book, assumingly written by Brian
Whitney who tries to shed a light with a subject matter whose stories are not
consistent. We also have the victim Jun
Lin who is but a footnote in the book.
This seems quite ridiculous and considering Brian Whitney is a crime
writer, you think he would have done a little bit of research beyond the
typical media fact sheet on Lin. A
couple of paragraphs about a person who was murdered seems a bit lazy.
Looking through his back catalogue, he seems to enjoy sensationalising
his subject matter without delving too deep.
His past output was letters from Arthur Shawcross. I grew up with Arthur Shawcross and know his
family as I am from the same small town and although I haven’t read the book,
saying that you are going to look into the mind of someone who thinks they are
deep but are shallow and lacks a lot of intelligence, shows you were this book,
in particular, is probably going.
My Son, The Killer, Whitney says that he has access to Magnotta
and then we get the same sound bites that have been radiating out of this case
since it exploded on the public due to a slow news day. Magnotta although trying to sound deep and
meaningful, really doesn’t come out with anything beyond the normal conspiracy
theories and not wanting to discuss the case at all. We are left with nothing really further which
considering the author claims to have personal contact with his subject, we are
left with pretty much nothing beyond the normal website or news that has
already been reported.
Most of the book is taken up by the mother, Anna Yourkin
about her son Luka. We have the classic
story of a woman in an abusive relationship with her husband. It does seem odd that we have an abusive
father who physically and mentally abuses his wife and children and they feel
that home schooling is the best way forward when raising your children. For whatever the reasons, we are left with a
flimsy reasoning behind this and justification that the other children are well
balanced. When the mother leaves the
husband, we have well balanced children entering society except for Luka who
was apparently bullied and only got on with children who had physical or mental
handicaps. I am not sure what is trying
to be betrayed here and it is an odd justification to be thrown in the mix.
The mother than states that she finds herself in another
abusive relationship to herself and her children and she chooses the man over
her son. Again, I am not quite sure if
this is to justify why Luka would become the person he became or to shed some
sympathy onto Luka as a boy. The story
then shifts from Luka becoming an apparent model, pornography, rent boy, etc
and the mother seems to approve of these life choices due to gifts and holidays
Luka is able to dispense among the family.
The couple of times that Luka does get in trouble with the law it is
always someone elses fault and Luka is the innocent party.
Once Luka murders Jun Lin, we now have an apparent close
knit family who turn their back on Luka because it is too much for them to
handle. They do not want the press or
media involved in their lives and show no support for their son who becomes a
murderer and uses the internet to publicise his crimes. This is a total contradiction to what is
written about how close and supportive they are with each other.
The cloud settles and now we have a mother who wants to get
back in touch with her boy. This time
she seems to have a supportive boyfriend in tow though his name is not
mentioned and starts building a relationship with her now famous son. Through the various chapters, we have a
mother who seems to be quite self-involved and it was extremely difficult to
have empathy for her.
The reasoning for writing a book does not really shed any
light on the crime that Luka Magnotta neither committed nor shed light on the
family structure. Everything has been
heavily documented and publicised before.
This in fact seems to be one of those crime books that is released to
capitalise on making money. I read the book
and was compelled to read to the end though my eyes rolled at quite a few
passages. The editor should be sued because
the facts playing against each other, dates and years are jumble and there are
so many contradictions within the pages it is hard to figure out what the main
purpose of this was. The passage where
she tells her son that she has written a book is a rather odd one because
apparently she had already written it and it is going to the publisher but we
have a chapter where she is telling her son about it.
Overall, the book is an over sensationalised inconsistent
crime that seems to settle between fiction and non fiction. Luka Magnotta comes across as a hard killer
and facts don’t really line up. If this
was to shed a light on who Luka is, it doesn’t really do this. I found him to be sad, pathetic and terribly
lonely figure who had mental issues due to family who left him out to dry. If he maybe had the support and love that a
person should have had, maybe things would not have lead up to what they
became. His mother is looking for pity
and justification due to her bad life choices and this book is about her coming
across as a victim although it portrays her as a conspirator to what her son
had become. The book comes across as non
apologetic and feels like a get rich scheme.
Maybe one day, Luka Magnotta will open up and let the world
see the real person but you are not going to find this person within these
pages. You have an apparent crime writer
who doesn’t do any research beyond Wikipedia and a mother who makes everything
about her. She exploited her son for
financial means when he was a pornography actor and rent boy and she continues
to exploit him now that he has become a famous killer. There is a probably a decent book to be had
with the right editor and the right people involved but this is not that
book. As for Luka Magnotta, a man of
great promise when born came out a by product of bad parenting and someone
forced to live in society’s underbelly.
